@Rocky
I think you might like this.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIE15HnVfwM&ab_channel=NevilleWheeldon
I think you might like this.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIE15HnVfwM&ab_channel=NevilleWheeldon
Something specifically magestic about the Lanc. The B-17 and B-24 were certainly iconic and awe-inspiring… and magestic, but the Lancaster was in a class of its own visually. I think the black belly paint for their typical night ops must have something to do with it along with the unusual greenhouse-like full canopy instead of a more conventional windshield. Gives them a distinctly menacing look, almost like giant, sinister Dragonflies of sorts.
Always wondered why they weren't fitted with heavier defensive weaponry though, like US .50 cals other than maybe weight considerations. Their .303 MGs were practical spit wads against the 20mm and 30mm shells the Luftwaffe were slinging at them. The .30 cals aboard Lancs were of US origin and essentially scaled down versions of the US M2 .50 cal their US heavy bomber counterparts implemented so retrofit couldn't have been too much of an obstacle.
FUN FACT- The Lancaster came very close to being the platform to drop the first A-Bombs on Japan. Their bomb bays allowed for far less modification to accomodate the "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" than the B-29. Obviously had this plan moved forward they would've been crewed by US Airmen trained up for the task but in the end it was decided that delivery aircraft should be a US design and the B-29 got the job. This scenario was hotly debated by USAAF brass.