data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7f49/b7f49b949b2b5eec0f0ce2ab9147cb2bf581bbf8" alt="Y10 :y10: :y10:"
[video=youtube;S2oymHHyV1M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2oymHHyV1M&feature=player_embedded[/video]
You don't want to mess around in the African bush!
![]()
Just a small pride of lion lurking behind him!
There's a full travel-blog from the guys on that trip - apparently they did not realise the lion were there until they saw the photo but I can't confirm the truth. But I can't believe that anyone familiar with the African bush would pose so casually with a pride of lion metres away particularly as lion hunt at night mostly. If it were me, and I knew the lion were there, I wouldn't have got out of the car.
In South Africa’s Western Cape Province, bones dating to the later Stone Age that were assumed to be domestic dogs , simply because of their proximity to human settlements. When the DNA was tested, these “dogs†all turned out to be black-backed jackals. That means that humans have had a relationship with Canis mesomelas that could have become like the relationship between humans and the wolves that became dogs.
I think the really big question is why black-backed jackals were never turned into true domestic animals. I think the big reason may have to do with their heightened aggression towards their social partners. I don’t think hunter-gatherers would tolerate that sort of aggression in a pet , which is one reason why I think the original wolf populations were far less aggressive towards their social partners than modern wolves are now. Further, both wolves and men had similar ecological niches, which is the basis of Schleidt and Shalter’s theory about the co-evolution of man and dog.