USA: Motorcycle deaths stay at same level despite overall safer roads

Triumph Motorcycle Forum - TriumphTalk

Help Support Triumph Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
A report released Tuesday by the Governors Highway Safety Association finds that no progress was made in reducing motorcyclist deaths in 2011, even as overall highway traffic deaths declined.

Based upon preliminary data for the first nine months of the year, from 50 states and the District of Columbia, GHSA projects that motorcycle fatalities remained at about 4,500 in 2011, the same level as 2010.


Meanwhile, earlier this month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration projected that overall motor vehicle fatalities declined 1.7 percent in 2011, reaching their lowest level since 1949.


Motorcycle deaths remain one of the few areas in highway safety where progress is not being made.

"It is disappointing that we are not making progress in motorcycle safety," said GHSA Chairman Troy Costales in a statement, "particularly as fatalities involving other motorists continue to decline. As the study notes, the strengthening economy, high gas prices, and the lack of all-rider helmet laws leave me concerned about the final numbers for 2011 and 2012. Every motorcyclist deserves to arrive at their destination safely. These fatality figures represent real people – they’re family, friends and neighbors."

Comparing the first nine months of 2010 with 2011, motorcyclist fatalities decreased in 23 states, with notable declines in many.

On the other hand, 26 states and the District Columbia showed an increase in motorcyclist deaths.

The economy influences motorcycle travel in several ways. With the economy improving in 2011 and furthering strengthening in 2012, more people will have disposable income for purchasing and riding motorcycles. At the same time, rising gas prices may cause more people to choose motorcycles for transportation because of their fuel efficiency.

The Governors Highway Safety Association is a nonprofit association representing the highway safety offices of states, territories, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.

The full report is available here
.
 
My thoughts on this article?:

1) "Improving economy"???? Ummmm......where is that happening?

2) Typical mainstream media doesn't dig into things very deeply.......they completely fail to mention that there has been an increase in motorcycles being ridden on the roads. In fact, there are far MORE new motorcyclists than the rate of deaths on them. So in essence, figuring-in the increase of bikes on the roads, percentage wise motorcycle fatalities have dropped.
 
One comment on this article nailed it:


This article is rather misleading. Fact is, the sheer number of riders has been increasing steadily over the past couple of decades (the number of households owning a motorcycle increased by 26% just from 2003-2008, for instance. . .more than 5x the rate of increase of automobile ownership).


Given the rapid rate of increase in the number of people riding motorcycles, the fact that motorcycle deaths have remained static IS a relative decrease. It means that as a percentage of the total riding population, fewer riders are dying every year.


Leave it to the MSM to leave out half the story, and only present it in its most sensational light.
 
Definately the increase in sales and the fact a lot more new riders who aren't experienced. And when you mix that with the insane amount of people swerving and changing lanes haphazardly due to cell phones and texting, it's a recipe for disaster. I've had more scary cell phone moments in the last 6 months than all the incidents from before that and from when cells first came out. It's getting hairy out there. New riders are especially vulnerable.
 
Typical liberal reporting style. Not only has the number of motorcycles on the road increased; but the inattentiveness of cagers with GPS's, cellphones and texting has dramatically increased. While cages may be safer and protect the occupants better than in the past, we do not have that advantage on bikes.
 
all i see in that report is ......cage drivers are still driving like idiots ! and have no regard for motorcyclists what so ever !
and as you all have said bikes have massively increased over the past decade ,yet accidents have stayed relitivly the same !

meaning bikers are a safer bunch than the average cage driver . i rest my case :soap:
 
What i just don't understand is that if you are caught drinking and driving they give it to you like you robbed a bank and shot the teller. I have a friend who's brother got arrested and he went thru a year of hell and something like $15k worth of fines and fees. No licence for a long time, probation, just major punishment. Yet from what i have read the texters are more dangerous and in larger numbers. Yet they are simply fined $100 and thier done. Somebody please explain this to me !!! I suppose it's only a matter of time before we see MAT, mothers against texters. I sure hope so because i'm becoming horribly enraged with these idiots. I had one pull right into me yet again the day b4 yesterday and the only reason she didn't hit me was i was watching and aware and took evasive action. Now when it happens i scream at the top of my lungs "get off the %$#@ing phone as$$#@le !" I fear i'm gong to lose it one of these days and pull the old bikers foot denting the car thing. This is just the kind of thing that sets me off.
 
It is strange that they give such low priority towards texting as it should be high on the list of really bad things to do while driving. I can still see speaking on a phone while driving could be a lesser crime as you should still have your eyes on the road but I suppose the mind is some where else. Funny you can be sitting in a car driving and chatting to three other people in the car and still be driving well so what makes a cell phone so different when talking on it that some lose all concept of every other thing around them.
 
Like i think i've mentioned before, it's probably because when on the phone your mind is constantly picturing the person talking to you and your eyes may be on the road but your mind isn't. As to the degree of punishment between drinking and texting, the only criteria that should be used to decide how serious the punishment should be is the damage it does. If texting kills as often as DUI, then the punishment should be no different. What really bothers me beyond words is the reasoning they give for not raising the punishment. I have heard this several times, and coincidentally i just heard it yet again on the news 4 hours ago. They had a segment on texting and phoning and they were talking about trying to raise the fines to a few hundred dollars i think it was, and they i hears those words, and i'm paraphrasing here....."people think it's just to severe". So in other words, people get to choose the degree of punishment for this particular crime via public outrage, is that it?! "Uh, but i don't want to pay that much, it's not fair". But it's fair when some idiot kills me on my Tbird. A few hundred bucks aint fair, but killing me is ok. And someone who kills as often because they drink and drive can be punished literally 100 times as severely. Just shoot me now.....i live in a world that has become one big mental institution.
 
The AMA (American Motorcyclist Association) responds to the about flawed study:


Motorcyclist Fatalities Did Not Increase in 2011

Courtesy of American Motorcyclist Association
Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Motorcyclist fatalities for 2011 will be about the same as 2010, according to a preliminary report released on May 21 by the Governors Highway Safety Association, the American Motorcyclist Association reports.

Based on preliminary data, the GHSA reports that fatalities decreased by 1.67 percent during the first nine months of 2011. However, the association projects the final tally will be very close to the 4,502 fatalities reported for 2010. That figure is a slight increase over the number of fatalities reported for 2009 (4,469), which represented a dramatic 16 percent decline from 2008.

"Any motorcycle fatality is one too many, but we are encouraged that the report's preliminary finding suggests that overall motorcycle fatalities in 2011 will not be greater than 2010," said AMA President and CEO Rob Dingman.

"Interpreting crash, injury and fatality data is challenging because states have historically struggled with calculating actual motorcycle usage," said Dingman, himself a former governor's highway safety program administer for New York. "Measuring fatalities against motorcycle registrations is not effective because it does not take into account how many miles riders are putting on their motorcycles at any given time."

Dingman added that the economy, gasoline prices and weather are also variables that are difficult to quantify when determining motorcycle usage.

The lack of sufficient data underscores the critical need for a new comprehensive crash causation study, such as the one currently under way at Oklahoma State University. The study is being conducted at the Oklahoma Transportation Center under a $2.8 million Federal Highway Administration grant approved by Congress, along with more than $125,000 committed by the AMA and funds from six state safety programs -- New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Wisconsin -- for another $750,000.

The last comprehensive crash causation study was published in 1981 by Professor Hugh "Harry" Hurt Jr. Hurt's groundbreaking work provided a wealth of data that has been used to develop training and strategies to help keep riders safer on the road, and earned Hurt a posthumous induction into the AMA Motorcycle Hall of Fame.

Dingman took issue with one of the GHSA report recommendations.

"We do not agree that mandatory helmet laws are a solution," said Dingman. "The AMA strongly encourages helmet use, but helmets do nothing to prevent motorcycle crashes. Our experience with helmet mandates shows us that when they are enforced, scarce resource dollars are directed away from rider training and motorist awareness, effective programs that reduce the risk of a crash occurring in the first place."

Rider training and motorist awareness programs are strongly supported by the motorcycling community, and are also recommended in the GHSA report.

About the American Motorcyclist Association
Since 1924, the AMA has protected the future of motorcycling and promoted the motorcycle lifestyle. AMA members come from all walks of life, and they navigate many different routes on their journey to the same destination: freedom on two wheels. As the world's largest motorcycling rights organization, the AMA advocates for motorcyclists' interests in the halls of local, state and federal government, the committees of international governing organizations, and the court of public opinion. Through member clubs, promoters and partners, the AMA sanctions more motorsports competition and motorcycle recreational events than any other organization in the world. AMA members receive money-saving discounts from dozens of well-known suppliers of motorcycle services, gear and apparel, bike rental, transport, hotel stays and more. Through the AMA Motorcycle Hall of Fame, the AMA honors the heroes and the heritage of motorcycling for future generations. For more information, please visit
www.AmericanMotorcyclist.com.

 
I suppose the numbers here can really be hard to calculate by the looks of it. At the end of it no matter how many more or less riders you have the actual death are what count. If last year you had 10 killed and this year you have 15 killed you still have 5 more than last year. Percentage wise as far as actual riders and the increase your overall percentage may still be less even if more did get killed.
 
I think texting while driving should result in a years suspension of drivers licenses. If texting caused an accident, it should be two year suspension and a mandatory 30 day jail sentence. If it caused a death, it should be treat the same as DUI manslaughter.
 
over here it is manditory that after a crash the police check the phone records of the drivers involved, to see if any of them was using there phone before ths accident .
and if they where ...and it is found the phone was in use ! that driver carry's all the blame , even if the other driver was more at fault !
and the sentence is much stiffer .
 

Latest posts

Back
Top