Whatever happened to BSA revival?

Triumph Motorcycle Forum - TriumphTalk

Help Support Triumph Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The expected revival of the traditional British motorcycle brand, BSA, seems to have stalled more than three years after the brand was bought by Mahindra.

Indian tractor and automotive company Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M) bought the revered brand for $A5.4m in October 2016 through their wholly owned subsidiary, Classic Legends Private Limited (CLPL).

At the time they expressed intentions to make it a traditional-styled revival.

A few months later Italian motorcycle designer Oberdan Bezzi released some sketches of BSA models but they were never confirmed.

BSA MX 355 sketches revival BSA Desert Sled 355 sketches
Xmas revival

On Boxing Day 2017, M&M boss Anand Mahindra Tweeted a short note that suggested they would produce a new motorcycle by Christmas 2018.
BSA tweet Mahindra


His Tweet, accompanied by the old advertising image above, reads:
BSA tweet Mahindra


However, two Christmases have now passed and there is not even a hint from Mahindra about reviving the brand.

Several old motorcycle brands have been revived in recent years including Bultaco, Brough, Hesketh, Levis, Matchless, Norton and Jawa.

The latter was also revived by Mahindra’s Classic Legends who released a range of classic motorcycles for the local market in late 2018 and added the Perak bobber in November 2018.

Jawa Perak bobber revival

Jawa Perak bobber

When they launched, the order website crashed because of demand.

They said they planned to sell 90,000 bikes a year.

But despite the interest, the Jawa relaunch has been fraught with production problems and delays of up to a year.

Some customers cancelled their orders in frustration.

And that’s just for domestic sale. They haven’t even contemplated exports.

Jawa say that production is improving and customers only need now wait a few weeks for a bike.

However, Mahindra’s boss recently lamented getting into motorcycles at all, so the revival of BSA could be stalled permanently.

BSA history

The inside cover of the original BSA factory record book Why you should secretly mark your bike

An original BSA factory record book

BSA stands for Birmingham Small Arms Company Limited and it began in 1861 making guns.

It gradually moved into bicycles and motorcycles for which they are most famous, although they also made cars, buses, tools and other metal products over the years.

Its most famous motorcycles were the Gold Star 350cc and 500cc single-cylinder four-stroke bikes considered among the fastest of the 1950s. At the time, BSA was also the world’s biggest motorcycle manufacturer.

However, the halcyon post-war days slipped away in the 1960s under competition from more modern and reliable Japanese models.

BSA went bankrupt in the early 1970s and merged with the Norton Villiers Triumph Group. BSA-branded machines ceased production in 1973.

BSA is currently just a brand that churns out motorcycle t-shirts and merchandise.

The post Whatever happened to BSA revival? appeared first on Motorbike Writer.
 
Of all the British motorcycle brands i always thought it would be BSA that would be back first ! .... and it still suprises me that none of the other motorcycle manufacturers took it on after seeing how successful Triumph have been ?
 
A few weeks ago I read an interview with the CEO of Mahindra and he was also questioned about BSA.
He said he regrets getting involved with motorcycles and what happens in the future with BSA in particular is up for question.
Reading between the lines, I don't think there is any priority in development and I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for one.

It's just my opinion, but I think the success of Royal Enfield and their new 650 twin may have something to do with no rush to develop a BSA.
 
My first motorbike was a BSA, so part of me would like to see a revival, but a BSA branded bike from India however successful is not really the same as the Triumph revival. To be the same it would have to be a UK manufacturer reviving the brand in my view.

With the decline in motorcycle sales in the west there may not be room for another brand revival anyway.

But if they don't revive the brand the cost of buying BSA will be a costly write-off.
 
Not sure exactly why but living in the UK at 17 years old I wanted a Triumph or, if I won the Pools, a Norton Commando. BSA just didn't do it. I think the styling on BSA just missed the mark for me. One thing the new Triumph revival proved, it has to be a revival of the original not a complete style change. To the Triumph newcomer the latest Triumphs do hark back to the 60's & 70's, the heyday for English motorcycles. Put my Bonneville next to its new descendant and the difference is actually quite marked. But that's not the point, a new SpeedTwin still smells of the Ace Cafe and tearing up the North Circular. It has all the gain with none of the pain of its ancestor. If Mahatmegandi or whoever wish to launch BSA then first they have to understand the fun we had back then riding an original twin cylinder English motorcycle on a cold drizzly November night in the North of England with me mates. I can still smell the vinegar from the fish & chips and the feel of the newspaper wrapping. The excessive amount of time spent discussing girls or avoiding marauding gangs of skinheads on their Vespas and Lambrettas. This is in the very DNA of British motorcycling. Can an Indian conglomerate really understand any of this this? Sanitise it too much and they miss the whole point. In my humble opinion the latest Enfield is getting dangerously close to losing the plot.
I just wish the boys at Norton had got it right. A genuine Norton Commando rebirth would have been a glorious thing to behold. A modern old Triumph next to a modern old Commando, does it get any better?
 
The Triumph revival is a rather unique story in that it was well financed, well engineered and they caught the nostalgia market at the right time. They continue to introduce different variants of their 900 and 1,200 cc retro bikes that are attractive and priced from reasonable on up to expensive, but the commonality of parts make their retro line extremely profitable. Same can be said for the two ADV bikes, price competitive and reliable. I’ve owned both a Street Triple and a 675 R Daytona nice!
The Norton revival has been an utter disaster and I’m a long time Norton rider, with a garage full. The Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is a steal.
BSA’s were never as big as Triumph or Norton in the US, and now Royal Enfield pricing makes other potential Brit revivals problematic.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top